|
課程名稱 |
國家發展理論與政策專題
Seminar on Theories and Policies of National Development |
|
開課學期 |
111-1 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 國家發展研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
張國暉 |
|
課號 |
NtlDev7056 |
|
課程識別碼 |
341 M5140 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
必修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期四6,7,8(13:20~16:20) |
|
上課地點 |
國發206 |
|
備註 |
碩士班共同必修。
總人數上限：20人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
掌握國家發展基本知識。包括：熟悉現代國家理論、當代發展理論及發展型國家的趨勢，理解近代台灣、東亞及歐美國家的國家發展經驗，並培養學生觀察及認識當代國際發展的多樣視角，進而幫助學生如何從國家及發展理論出發，尋找及研究本土、東亞及全球的國家發展議題。
建立碩士生基本能力：閱讀(判斷、綜整、分析…)、寫作(節奏、對象、策略…)。 |
|
課程目標 |
待補本課程分四大部分。第一部分為國家，主要使學生能認識及瞭解國家理論內涵及趨勢。第二部分則探討國家的政治善是甚麼？為何民主是可欲的政治善？第三部分主題著重在發展型國家理論及政策，我們將檢視當代東亞經濟、政治及社會等發展議題。第四部分則探討全球化下國家轉型理論與經驗的議題，特別是有關永續及數位發展。 |
|
課程要求 |
1. 心得(第2、3、4週必選，其餘任選7篇，共10篇，期中考前(10/28)應至少5篇)、課程參與及討論。
2. 量變而後質變（K. Marx）。培養閱讀英文、整理大量資訊（料）、組織複雜概念、書寫學術等耐心及能力。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
每週五 10:30~12:30 備註： 陳良治：以e-mail連繫另約。張國暉：每週五10:30-12:30，其他時間以e-mail另約。 |
|
指定閱讀 |
如每週課程進度。 |
|
參考書目 |
如每週課程進度。 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
參與課程 |
30% |
1. 出席、發言（問）、互相討論及回應等。需帶一個問題或感想到課堂發言。
2. 至少有一週引導課堂討論，每組共40-60分鐘即可(請先預演，千萬別超過時間)。注意：不只是內容報告，更要引起對話、討論、鎖定主題、設計活動、引發問題等等。報告講義以一張A4為原則，一面兩頁，雙面四頁（如課綱形式），並請製作PPT。無講義也可。
3. 為因應當前疫情，建議各位同學盡量在教室內至少間隔一個空位就座，避免緊鄰。另請最早到課同學們協助先將門窗都開啟。
4. 如因未來有居家檢疫、自主管理或其他健康需求的同學，在一定期限內可採遠距教學修課。請同學先熟悉相關操作方法。
5. 如因未來疫情需要，可能改為遠距教學，請同學先熟悉相關操作方法。遠距教室網址：https://meet.google.com/wjw-xxuk-dwm |
2. |
每週心得 |
70% |
在12個單元主題週當中，需交心得10篇（第2、3、4週必選，其餘任選7篇，共10篇期中考(10/28)前應至少5篇）：
1. 請當週週三中午12 點前上傳COOL，逾期將影響成績。
2. 長度1-2頁，至少1,500字（請在頁末標註字數，請註明姓名及週次）。
3. 開始使用碩論體例（如引註、參考書目等，請參考《國家發展研究》期刊體例，https://www.nd.ntu.edu.tw/cp.aspx?n=61）。
4. 切勿抄襲，若出現會大幅影響總成績。 |
3. |
出席 |
0% |
無故缺席、遲到將顯著影響成績。超過三次缺席者將不及格，包括第一週。第一週未出席者，請自行詳讀課綱或先找同學了解已提過的問題。 |
|
|
針對學生困難提供學生調整方式 |
|
上課形式 |
|
|
作業繳交方式 |
|
|
考試形式 |
|
|
其他 |
由師生雙方議定 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/8 |
主題：課程簡介（課程架構、每週主題、每週教材(包括必讀及建議閱讀項目)、報告分組、資料下載、成績評量、論文寫作基礎、碩士基本能力…） |
|
第2週 |
9/15 |
主題：現代國家
教材：*1. Held, D. (1992). “The Development of the Modern State.” In Formations of Modernity, eds. by Stuart Hall and Bram Giben. Cambridge: Polity Press. Pp. 71-125.
*2.黃崇憲（2008）。〈利維坦的生成與傾頹：台灣國家研究範例的批判性回顧，1945-2005〉。收入謝國雄主編，《群學爭鳴：台灣社會學發展史，1945-2005》，頁321-392。台北：群學。
*3. Scott, James (2017). Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. CT: Yale University Press. (selected chapters, 有中文)
4.+ Scott, James (2009). The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. CT: Yale University Press. (selected chapters, 有中文) |
|
第3週 |
9/22 |
主題：新馬克思主義的國家觀點
教材：*1. Offe, C. & V. Ronge (1975). “Theses on the Theory of the State.” New German Critique 6: 137-147. (Also In: C. Offe and John B Keane eds, Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson. Pp. 119-129).
*2. Held, D. & Krieger, J. (1983). “Accumulation, Legitimation and the State: The Ideas of Claus Offe and Jürgen Habermas.” In States and Societies, edited by David Held et al. NY: New York University Press. Pp. 487-497.
3.+ Jessop, B. (1990). “Recent Theories of the Capitalist State.” In State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place, ed. by B. Jessop. Cambridge: Polity Press. Pp. 24-47. |
|
第4週 |
9/29 |
主題：國家中心論的國家觀點
教材：*1. Skocpol, Theda (1985). “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. NY: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 3-37.
*2. Skocpol, Theda (2008), “Bringing the State Back In: Retrospect and Prospect.” Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (2): 109-124.
3.+ Amenta, E. (2005). “Institutionalist and State-Centric Theories of Political Sociology.” In The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization, edited by Janoski et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 96-114. |
|
第5週 |
10/6 |
主題：民主理論
教材：*1 Held, D. (1993). “Liberalism, Marxism and Democracy.” In Modernity and Its Futures, eds by S. Hall, D. Held and T. McGrew. Cambridge: Polity Press. Pp. 13-60.
*2 Callinicos, Alex (1993). “Liberalism, Marxism, and Democracy: A Response to David Held.” Theory and Society 22: 283-288.
*3. 吳乃德(2020)。《臺灣最好的時刻，1977-1987：民族記憶美麗島》。台北：春山。(Ch. 1-3, 16-17) |
|
第6週 |
10/13 |
主題：民主與治理
教材: *1. Nordlinger, Eric (1981). On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. MA: Harvard University Press. (Ch. 1, 2, 8, 有中文)
*2. Acemoglu, Daron & James A. Robinson. (2019). The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. UK: Penguin. (Ch. 1-2, 14-15, 有中文).
*3. Runciman, David. (2018). How Democracy Ends. London: Profile Books. (有中文) (selected chapters, TBA)
4.+ Levitsky, Steven & Daniel Ziblatt. (2018). How Democracies Die. NY: Broadway Books. (有中文) (selected chapters, TBA)
5.+ Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. NY: Crown. (有中文) |
|
第7週 |
10/20 |
主題：民主、國際與全球化
教材：*1. Levitsky, Steven and Lucan A. Way (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. NY: Cambridge University Press. (chapters 1-2, 7-8)
*2. Rodrik, Dani. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. NY: WW Norton & Company. (Ch. 1, 9-12, 有中文)
3.+ Posner, Richard A. (2010). The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy. MA: Harvard University Press. (Intro. & Ch. 11, 12, 有中文)
4.+ 朱敬一（2020）。《牧羊人讀書筆記》。台北：印刻。(WTO、網路、地緣政治) |
|
第8週 |
10/27 |
期中考試週。不上課、不考試。請趕上作業進度。(10/28) |
|
第9週 |
11/3 |
主題：發展型國家(I)：理論概念
教材：*1. Oniz, Ziya (1991). “The Logic of the Development State.” Comparative Politics 24 (1): 109-126.
*2. Wu, Yongping (2004). “Rethinking the Taiwanese Developmental State.” The China Quarterly (177): 91-114.
*3. 王振寰、李宗榮、陳琮淵（2017）。〈台灣經濟發展中的國家角色：歷史回顧與理論展望〉。收錄《未竟的奇蹟：轉型中的台灣經濟與社會》，李宗榮、林宗弘編，頁49-88。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。
4.+ Evans, Peter (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. NJ: Princeton University. Ch. 1 (pp. 3-20) & 3 (pp. 43-73, skim).
5.+ Chu, Y.-w. (2016), "The Asian Developmental State: Ideas and Debates," in The Asian Developmental State: Reexaminations and New Departures, Yin-wah Chu, Ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
6.+ Williams, Michelle (2014). “Rethinking the Developmental State in the Twenty-First Century.” In The End of the Developmental State?, edited by Michelle Williams. New York: Routledge.
7.+ Amsden, Alice H. and Wan-wen Chu (2003). Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Ch. 1, 2, 5 中文)
8.+ Wong, Joseph (2012).〈在發展型國家裡的臺灣，還有什麼依然「在發展」？：全球科技創新年代下的產業重建〉，收入《臺灣及其脈絡》，頁35-60，廖炳惠、孫康宜、王德威等編，台北：台大。
9.+ Chu, Yin-Wah (2016). “Democratization, Emergence of the Knowledge-Based Economy, and the Changing Developmental Alliances in South Korea and Taiwan.” In The Asian Developmental State Reexaminations and New Departures, edited by Yin-Wah Chu, pp. 117-138. NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
10.+ 瞿宛文（2017）。《台灣戰後經濟發展的源起：後進發展的為何與如何》。台北：聯經。Intro., pp. 1-16 and Ch. 1, pp. 17-58. |
|
第10週 |
11/10 |
主題：發展型國家(II)：後發展型國家
教材：*1. Chu, Y.-w. (2021), "Democratization, globalization, and institutional adaptation: the developmental states of South Korea and Taiwan," Review of International Political Economy, 28 (1), 59-80. (台韓)
*2. Weiss, L. and E. Thurbon (2021), "Developmental State or Economic Statecraft? Where, Why and How the Difference Matters," New Political Economy, 26 (3), 472-489.(韓美)
*3. Kalinowski, T. (2021), "The politics of climate change in a neo-developmental state: The case of South Korea," International Political Science Review, 42 (1), 48-63.(韓、綠能)
4.+ Hamilton-Hart, N. and H. Wai-chung Yeung (2021), "Institutions under pressure: East Asian states, global markets and national firms," Review of International Political Economy, 28 (1), 11-35.
5.+ Yeung, Henry Wai-Chung (2017). “Rethinking the East Asian Developmental State in Its Historical Context: Finance, Geopolitics and Bureaucracy.” Area Development and Policy 2 (1): 1-23.
6.+ 朱敬一（2020）。《牧羊人讀書筆記》。台北：印刻。(「究竟是否要產業政策?」, pp. 256-263) |
|
第11週 |
11/17 |
主題：發展型國家(III)：台灣的產業發展
教材：*1. Hsieh, Michelle F. (2011). “Similar Opportunities, Different Responses: Explaining Divergent Patterns of Development between Taiwan and South Korea.”International Sociology 26(3): 364-391. (產業結構、製造業)
*2. 王振寰（2010），《追趕的極限：台灣的經濟轉型與創新》。台北：巨流。(Ch. 5) (平台型國家、製藥業)
*3. Chien, K.-h. (2019), "Pacing for Renewable Energy Development: The Developmental State in Taiwan’s Offshore Wind Power," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-15.(綠能)
4.+ Wang, J.-h. (2016), "Toward a Platform Builder: The State’s Role in Taiwan’s Biopharmaceutical Industry," in The Asian Developmental State: Reexaminations and New Departures, Yin-wah Chu, Ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
5.+ Hsu, J.-y. (2017), "State transformation and the evolution of economic nationalism in the East Asian developmental state: the Taiwanese semiconductor industry as case study," Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, n/a-n/a.(半導體)
6.+ Cheng, An-Ting (2022), "Reinventing the industrial land use policy in democratized development states – A comparison of Taiwan and South Korea," Land Use Policy, 112, 105857
7.+ Lin, C.-Y. (2022), "Exploring the spatialities of institutional entrepreneurship in Taipei’s FinTech industry," Regional Studies, 1-13.
8.+ O'Meara, S. (2020), "From plastic toys to Industry 4.0: How Taiwan is using science to upgrade its manufacturing," Nature, 577 (7790), S1-S3.
9.+ 李宗榮、林宗弘（2017）。〈「台灣製造」的崛起與失落：台灣的經濟發展與經濟社會學〉。收錄《未竟的奇蹟：轉型中的台灣經濟與社會》，李宗榮、林宗弘編，頁1-48。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。
10.+ 謝國雄評論、林宗弘回應、李宗榮回應 (2019)。三短篇。 |
|
第12週 |
11/24 |
專題演講：數位治理 (講者及講題TBA) |
|
第13週 |
12/1 |
主題：朝向永續發展(I)：治裡面概念及挑戰
教材：*1. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). (2018). IRGC Guidelines for the Governance of Systemic Risks: In Systems and Organisations in the Context of Transitions. Lausanne: International Risk Governance Center. (Ch. 1)
*2. European Environment Agency (EEA). (2017). Perspectives on Transitions to Sustainability. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. (Ch. 1)
*3. 張國暉（2019）。〈從政府治理到轉型研究及風險治理：來自系統、科技與頑強問題的新刺激〉。《思與言：人文與社會科學期刊》56(3)：233-285。
4.+ Loorbach, Derk (2014). To Transition! Governance Anarchy in the New Transformation. Netherland: Erasmus University Rotterdam. |
|
第14週 |
12/8 |
主題：主題：朝向永續發展(II)：社會技術系統轉型
教材：*1. Geels, F. W. (2019), "Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective," Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 187-201. (MLP)
*2. De Propris, L. and D. Bailey (2021), "Pathways of regional transformation and Industry 4.0," Regional Studies, 55 (10-11), 1617-1629. (MLP, application, geography)
*3. Gerschewski, J. (2021). "Explanations of Institutional Change: Reflecting on a “Missing Diagonal”. American Political Science Review, 115, 218-233. (change, cause, time)
4.+ Schot, J. and L. Kanger (2018), "Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality," Research Policy, 47 (6), 1045-1059.
5.+ Goyal, N. and M. Howlett (2020), "Who learns what in sustainability transitions?," Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 311-321.
6.+ Hoogstraaten, M. J., K. Frenken & W. P. C. Boon (2020) The study of institutional entrepreneurship and its implications for transition studies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 114-136.
7.+ Köhler, J., F. W. Geels, F. Kern, J. Markard, E. Onsongo, A. Wieczorek, F. Alkemade, F. Avelino, A. Bergek, F. Boons, L. Fünfschilling, D. Hess, G. Holtz, S. Hyysalo, K. Jenkins, P. Kivimaa, M. Martiskainen, A. McMeekin, M. S. Mühlemeier, B. Nykvist, B. Pel, R. Raven, H. Rohracher, B. Sandén, J. Schot, B. Sovacool, B. Turnheim, D. Welch & P. Wells (2019), “An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1-32.
8.+ Markard, J., M. Hekkert & S. Jacobsson (2015) The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 76-86.
9.+ Strambach, S. & G. Pflitsch (2020). “Transition topology: Capturing institutional dynamics in regional development paths to sustainability.” Research Policy, 49, 104006. |
|
第15週 |
12/15 |
主題：朝向永續發展(III)：轉型政策
教材：*1.Weber, K. M. & H. Rohracher (2012). “Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework.” Research Policy, 41, 1037-1047. (MLP, Innovation system, policy)
*2. Grillitsch, M., T. Hansen, L. Coenen, J. Miörner & J. Moodysson (2019). “Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden.” Research Policy, 48, 1048-1061. (policy design, empirical study)
*3. Reichardt, K. & K. Rogge (2016). “How the policy mix impacts innovation: Findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 62-81. (policy mix, empirical study)
4.+ Edmondson, D. L., F. Kern & K. S. Rogge (2019). “The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions.” Research Policy, 48, 103555. (policy mix)
5.+ Hess, D. J. & Q. D. Mai (2014). “Renewable electricity policy in Asia: A qualitative comparative analysis of factors affecting sustainability transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 12, 31-46.
6.+ Kanda, W., M. Kuisma, P. Kivimaa & O. Hjelm (2020). “Conceptualising the systemic activities of intermediaries in sustainability transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 449-465.
7.+ Kanger, L., B. K. Sovacool & M. Noorkõiv (2020). “Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review.” Research Policy, 49, 104072.
8.+ Kivimaa, P. (2014). “Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions.” Research Policy, 43, 1370-1380.
9.+ Laatsit, M., M. Grillitsch & L. Fünfschilling (2022). “Great expectations: the promises and limits of innovation policy in addressing societal challenges.” Lund University, CIRCLE-Centre for Innovation Research.
10.+ Meckling, J. & B. B. Allan (2020). “The evolution of ideas in global climate policy.” Nature Climate Change, 10, 434-438.
11.+ Rogge, K. S. (2019). “Policy mixes for sustainable innovation: conceptual considerations and empirical insights.” In Handbook of Sustainable Innovation, 165-185. Edward Elgar Publishing. |
|
第16週 |
12/22 |
期末考週。不上課、不考試，請趕上作業或期末報告進度。 |
|